Tribune Comments
A forum to address mass media propaganda.
Comments to the directors regarding a policy to promote population replacement in America through mass media propaganda:
October 20, 2006
Jeffrey Chandler, Director, et al
The Tribune Company
435 North Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60611
312-222-3232
Re: Why does the LA Times
portray illegal aliens as victims?
(Book enclosed: State of
Emergency by Patrick Buchanan)
Dear Mr. Chandler,
I
am a little puzzled as a shareholder. Can
you remedy a Los Angeles Times subscription decline when the Times itself
and your KTLA station in Los Angeles are both indirectly promoting and defending
what has grown into a huge undocumented alien population in California, that
is now beginning to sweep across the US? The repopulation of California by was blatantly
obvious by 1965, now it’s as clear as getting hit by a truck!
Perhaps
you could help with this issue by educating the LA Times and KTLA reporters
that pander to illegal aliens and portray them as victims; and possibly add
a few people who are aware of the demographic data regarding the repopulation
of California and now the entire United States.
You know that this country may be beginning to wake-up without the
help of the commercial media, thanks to the Internet, which anyone might think
would encourage more commercial media relevance; perhaps based on some understanding
of this country’s survival needs.
The LA Times has for decades portrayed illegal migrants as victims that are need to support America. Well decades ago I did construction work and have planted an orchard without any help, and when you encourage people to do more and better by example they regularly do, so I don’t see where the USA is dependent on Mexico for its survival. Doing work is comparatively easy, understanding the Tribune’s media philosophy is more of a challenge. Incidentally I’m not trying to encourage anything resembling a conservative philosophy nor any form of cultural or racial bias; a survival philosophy for the people of this country, well yes certainly.
As a recent example your staff writers, including Jennifer Delson, Christian Berthelsen and Christopher Goffard, on October 19, 2006 page B3, once again portrayed illegal aliens as the victims, in a bizarre and contrived incident, where for some unknown reason an anonymous letter was sent which had objected to any kind of implied right of non-citizens to vote in US elections; since an immigrant working for Tan Nguyen who is running for congress against Loretta Sanchez, had criticized the illegals who are now voting in our elections in order to throw the elections to Mexican candidates. (4) Of course any criticism of such illegal voting is somehow portrayed as discouraging to those migrating aliens who are intent on breaking into and repopulating this country. So the Vietnamese who tried to uphold American laws end up being the ones being investigated by the Department of Justice (DOJ); thanks to the bizarre accusations of the LA Times. Naturally Mexico’s laws and newspapers boldly defend the Mexican people from all invasions, illegal migration or voting by Americans, Guatemalans and everybody else; and even if no one breaks any laws, Mexico can still confiscate anyone’s house, car and money and put someone behind bars where they have to beg relatives to send money in order to stay alive. And somehow this is the sort of future were supposed to welcome here at the rate of 3.5 million illegal entrants per year, plus a population that doubles every 20 years? Why? So more copies of Hoy could be sold? When has any comparable survival help ever being extended to the people of this country? Years ago I’ve spoken with some corporate directors who believed that a massive flow of illegal aliens served their interests; and they maintained a close contact with the Whitehouse and the Bush presidency directly regarding this subject. After we discussed some of the details I realized that they had never thought through the issues, nor did they care about any disastrous consequences; and so they blindly pursued the engineering and mass reproduction of what they felt would be a more desperate and subservient humanity, that would serve their corporate interests.
Your LA Times reporter cleverly described only the public condemnations against some Vietnamese immigrant who made a relatively small syntax error by thinking that the word “immigrant” is distinguished from “citizen”, while in some contexts it may include those who are naturalized based on the English translation, while the Spanish translation might not typically imply this distinction, and so may not even be an error; all in order to turn a trivial syntax question into a massive national scale hate crime catastrophe; no doubt with the purpose of defending the bizarre position that illegal aliens should have a right to vote in our national elections? Which no doubt the Times writers would publicly deny, because the stories are all about implication; but at the same time the LA Times is blatantly promoting a full out assault against anyone who tries to suggest that illegal aliens shouldn’t vote. Then Ms Delson blames the attorney general’s office for pursuing criminal prosecution against someone who tried to uphold the voting laws. As a defense for her selective focus in the article, she shifts the blame to some defender of illegal aliens at the DOJ; which was how this convoluted point of view presented in the LA Times was all justified. Which resulted in the creation of an extraordinarily deceptive story, all fabricated out of a trivial syntax question made by an Asian immigrant; with the purpose of portraying Latino - Hispanic illegal aliens as victims!! How do I know this for sure? Because I spoke with this reporter at some length and I also know that she had no interest in considering the more serious issue of actual voter fraud, which occurs on a significant scale with no safeguards in place; all of which helps illegal aliens gain control over their life blood: welfare, jobs and political power, in order to pursue their Chicano Reconquista and repopulation. Incidentally this blatantly racist invasion is no longer targeted for just the southwest but now includes all of North America. The stories from the Times undoubtedly indicate that this the attitude you want to promote, apparently in all your newspapers and television stations throughout the US?
So
why does the LA Times portray over 40-60 million people who have recently
entered the United States illegally as victims? (4) That for some unknown reason can’t bear to ever return to the country
that they had impoverished and wrecked through overpopulation? Along with their multitudes of upset children
and violent gang members that can’t go back either? The 14th amendment didn’t establish
citizenship for the children of illegal aliens who break American laws or
intentionally invade this country, just because their parents left jobs in
their home country for 10 times better pay here; incidentally denying millions
of Americans construction, agriculture and service industry jobs in their
own country; then proceed to blatantly accuse Americans that they can’t feed
themselves without the help of illegal aliens; although Americans have been
feeding themselves and much of the world for centuries.
Illegals
further claim they have the right to repopulate the United States, because
Spain meant to give North America exclusively to Mexicans, who are thanks
to the University of Arizona’s DNA analysis, known descendants of Siberians
and Mongolians, and not actually native to the Americas, nor even practicing
any indigenous way of life and not even vaguely considerate of our natural
world; who are in fact an extraordinarily nationalistic people dedicated to
the interests of Mexico and the invasion of their enemy the United States. Apparently China had to build a number of 4000
mile long walls over thousands of years, the last one being approximately
25-30 feet wide and 30 feet tall, all built by hand and out of stone to protect
China from aggression and a genocidal invasion, that is now occurring to the
United States on a far more massive scale with approximately 100,000,000 illegals
who have entered since 1965, along with a population that doubles every 20
years; at a cost to Americans of over 2 trillion dollars per year in welfare,
food and rent subsidies, with a multitude of free legal and social services,
free education, free jobs, the confiscation of America’s cities and infrastructure,
the spread of third world diseases, the long-term burdening of America’s national
debt, and finally by the murder of 9000 Americans each year by a people that
are forcibly tripling the homicide rate here.
Mexicans apparently don’t want to know that they are not indigenous, and migrated here from Siberia, Mongolia and Western Europe as everyone else; because they are engaged in a genocidal war based on reproductive conquest, that has vastly more deadly consequences for the US than World War 2 and is not being reported; the fact is the invasion is being actively covered-up, which means it’s being protected, by the Tribune Company including the LA Times and KTLA.
And
we are supposed to believe that these invaders from a considerably more violent
culture, who crossed our borders, typically at night, are somehow the victims
of our country; and that all the Americans who are loosing their country with
no real options of moving, obtaining jobs or citizenship anywhere else are
somehow the mean spirited racist; while the people who invaded our country
and who blatantly created hundreds of exclusionary racist organizations and
even label themselves racist or “La Raza” with slogans like:
"For The Race
everything. Outside The Race, nothing." these people are somehow our
amigos? (2) All because a few unbalanced
wealthy Americans want a massive continent of 2 billion consumers? Greater consumption isn’t fundamental to wealth.
The supposedly subservient migrants that are being paid to repopulate
America can easily eliminate that vision of a new North American empire founded
on consumption, perhaps violently. There
is no evidence that Mexico is offering us a stable economic or political model,
nor are have many of the best and brightest of Mexico crossed our borders
at night. We are certainly getting the most desperate,
aggressive and violent who are intent on intentionally over populating and
conquering this country through violence or a civil war when they are the
majority; which is not particularly far in the future.
The more homogeneous
population that used to read the LA Times 50 years ago has declined from 96%
of the region’s inhabitants to a very small fraction of the current births. And the LA Times hasn’t even hired one writer
to mention any of the related demographic and survival issues, nor identified
the illegal alien strategies, nor suggested any solutions? Is this because the LA Times and the Tribune
Company need to play it safe, or in fact want this country taken over by a
population they believe they can control, like the ruling elite in Mexico
City? Well there’s nothing safe about
any such a political transformation; it can be undoubtedly disastrous for
what remains of your readers and perhaps your company, based on the last half
century's data.
It’s difficult to understand
why anyone might care to reshape public opinion in order to multiply what
they believe is a subservient population; such as Cardinal Mahoney and his
Good Samaritan homilies which have nothing to do with a justification for
the repopulation of the United States, any more than moving petafiles around
saves the Church money. Particularly
when there’s a creative hardworking population here that originated the most
successful industries and country in history; and their reward now is to be
disposed of. Such political objectives
take a chance of being charged with crimes against humanity; particularly
since the repopulation process can be readily classified as genocide by some
Nuremberg like tribunal. If 100 million
illegal aliens invaded Mexico, the United Nations and NATO would both be sending
in troops to drive out and eliminate the invaders. Perhaps only America’s
spin-doctors could package a repopulation program and try to make it appear
benign, at least for a while.
As you know the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 backed
by Edward Kennedy was only part of the key to opening the borders. The other part was simply to ignore the entire
unfenced border along with all the employment and immigration laws, including
the 14th amendment, which doesn’t legalize anchor-babies.
Coincidentally JFK was the last president to maintain the integrity
of our borders. I have walked along the beach from south of
San Diego into Playas de Tijuana without any interruptions during the mid
1980’s. In fact it’s fairly easy to
leave Mexico and cross into San Diego County today. There is a battle here that has been in progress since 1965 intended
to overwhelm America through open borders, mass migration and the export of
American technology, along with a massive national debt; all of which is incrementally
costing the livelihood and the survival of millions of families that are being
eliminated forever in this grotesque invasion and reproductive assault; which
is fully supported by our tax dollars. As an alternative to this catastrophic assault
your media outlets could be instrumental in this country’s survival by simply
broadening the range of news coverage. Incidentally
Clear Channel’s KFI radio is doing well in the ratings objecting to this invasion
and the aggressive Reconquista policy scheduled for America.
With
over 1000 stations being devoted to Latino/Hispanic programming, there’s now
only one AM radio show in the western US that provides even a small portion
of its time to some of America’s survival needs; all of which is certainly
more than a little biased. Which does
not suggest that the topic has to be divisive; because there are over 40 million
Mexican-Americans that are also going to be impacted by the continuing invasion
along with everybody else. Nor are
there any significant charitable contributions being offered to defend this
country; while the Ford Foundation among many others are contributing 10’s
of millions financing illegal immigration advocacy groups. Is the invasion and repopulation of America
intentional? It’s impossible to see
how any of this could be accidental; there’s far too much evidence. Some of the questions that might surface are:
is killing off America and replacing its people legal? Who is involved, who supported the effort and
who benefited? Apparently there are
a variety of solutions to some of the dilemmas that have been developed during
the past ½ century, however I wouldn’t presume that would be an area of interest,
so I’ll end here. Besides I wouldn’t
be surprised if you were vastly better informed about the history of this
struggle over supposedly lower cost labor and the North American Union.
Nevertheless I had expected a more aware media response to such a significant
issue by 1970 at the latest; and now I see that there has been no consideration
at the LA Times or KTLA during the past 40 years.
What would the publishers and station managers be waiting for? Obviously 2% of your influence could initiate a tremendous opportunity
for understanding that could benefit the survival of all cultures, and turn
America’s future in a positive direction that could be sustained for centuries,
as well as be profitable for your company; all of which is my fervent hope. However I would be extraordinarily surprised
if any consideration for America’s humanity and survival were ever to appear
on the Tribune’s agenda; even if simply to elevate the vision of your media
and its corresponding value.
Sincerely,
tribuneco
@ lycos. com
___________________________________________
:latimes-victims
_____________________________
Footnotes:
1)
| Student Racial and Ethnic History (Entire Los Angeles Unified School
District) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
__________________________
2)
q
The various media universally try to identify
illegal aliens as immigrants or undocumented workers.
Neither are true, illegal aliens are not immigrants, they are in fact
considerably more aggressive people who broke in to rob another country of
its resources created by many generations of another people.
Incidentally Americans would be imprisoned or killed if we invaded
Mexico in the same way; and second they are not undocumented, they are well
documented in Mexico or some other country.
Here they are actually invaders clinging to their national heritage.
Significantly, anyone opposed to the invasion of the United States
is called anti-immigrant by most media outlets or labeled a racist, even if
they are legal Mexicans, Asian or Italian immigrants themselves.
The terms Latino and Hispanic were contrived by Mexicans to sell a
more marketable image of illegal aliens, so that it seemed like they came
from Italy or Spain, in order to redirect America’s attention away from the
massive reproductive conquest being forced on the US by 100 million illegal
aliens, who kill 3 times as many Americans every year as the 9/11/2001 attacks;
by a population that doubles every 20 years and which we are compelled to
finance. The population of Mexico was 10 million in 1910, it’s now over 240
million in both the United States and Mexico, with a predominant allegiance
to Mexico; which is supported by hundreds of Mexican political organizations
in the United States, which are in turn funded by the Ford Foundation and
almost every major corporation in the United States.
_____________________________
3) Considerations and questions:
q
There are many bright and capable Mexicans; so why does the
US set-up the primary path for migration to the United States that requires
climbing over a fence at night; that only attracts the most desperate, uneducated
and violent Mexicans and Central Americans, that are determined to repopulate
the US, take our jobs, test their violent skills here and tell us we’re in
the wrong country, while sustaining a replacement culture on over 1000 Latino/Hispanic
television and radio stations?
q
The Apache and Navajo have
been expelling Aztecs and Mexicans for thousands of years in response to their
invasions, their violence and human sacrifices in the Arizona and New Mexico
region; some of which history is described in Geronimo’s autobiography. The US Army however attacked the Apache and
ended America’s border defense and the balance that was being maintained by
Geronimo until 1886.
q
Why does Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa get more
television airtime, including on KTLA, than all other national, state and
local politicians combined? It must
be obvious that he has a long history as a proud La Raza Reconquista advocate,
and is being popularized for the role of Governor or President; to terminate
the history of the United States.
q
When the people who created the richest country in history
literally die off, and at the same time they are invaded and taken over by
an aggressive and violent neighbor; -- that has to be the most serious case
of mismanagement and genocide in world history; and then we get a mass media
cover-up that tells us not to notice that 100 million desperate and pissed-off
people speaking a foreign language, and considering that the entire continent
is exclusively theirs are here to stay, and being given our jobs, our schools,
our cities, our taxes and our welfare; without contributing even 1/10 of one-percent
of the costs.
q
If America became an overpopulated violent slum of 500 million
that looks like Mexico, this country may not be as economically successful
as Japan with just 100 million. However
further growing to a population of 2 billion largely desperate and aggressive
people may just end up creating an environmental and economic disaster with
little opportunity for recovery. Has
anyone ever researched the overpopulated countries on the edge of a civil
war, and observed the massive tragedies that result? Apparently we are moving toward that future.
q
The population replacement
that happened in Los Angeles is happening to Europe and Australia.
This is the legacy of one billion human lives that is being lost forever
and aggressively replaced by desperation and the impoverishment of humanity
and nature; which can ultimately permanently impoverish the future of humanity.
How is that conceivably beneficial for anyone?
q
None of these observations are a suggestion that
any form of special consideration regarding any of these issues needs to be
extended; just the restoration of all damages inflicted and all lives lost,
with the presentation of in depth understanding and fairness in the mass media,
with at least the same degree of permanent protection that has been offered
the people in Mexico; without the promotion of deceptions, invasion, repopulation
nor continued assaults against America’s people, and by supporting the survival
and well-being of America’s beneficial human legacy. How could understanding and survival be too costly to ever be considered?
_____________________________
4)
Times story referenced,
excerpt from the story of October 17, 2006:
State Investigating Intimidating Letter Sent to O.C. Latinos
Anti-illegal
immigrant group disavows the letter, which focuses on voting issues.
By Jennifer Delson, Times Staff Writer
October 17, 2006
The state attorney general is investigating a Spanish-language
letter warning some Orange County Latinos that they could be jailed or deported
if they vote in the November election.
The letter, which purports to be from a Huntington Beach-based group, also
warns that the state has developed a tracking system that will allow the names
of Latino voters to be handed over to anti-immigrant groups.
"You
are advised that if your residence in this country is illegal or you are an
immigrant, voting in a federal election is a crime that could result in jail
time …," the letter says.
… One person who received the letter is the wife of a Garden
Grove City Council candidate. She said her husband, Benny Diaz, called friends
after the letter arrived and found five others with Latino surnames who had
received the note.
"It's a very malicious and degrading letter. It's to pull Latinos down
and make them afraid," said Diaz, who is president of the Garden Grove
chapter of the League of United Latin American Citizens.
"Of course it's going to affect me and any other Latino candidate in
Orange County," he added.
John Trasviña, interim president and general counsel for the Mexican American
Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said he had asked the U.S. Department
of Justice to investigate the letter.
Sen. Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles), who called on California Secretary of
State Bruce McPherson and state Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer to investigate, believes
the letter is an effort to scare Latinos from voting in Orange County.
"You can't help but feel disgusted with the contents of this letter….
I'm not just going to sit silent," said Romero, who is up for reelection
in November.
Lockyer spokesman Nathan Barankin said the letter was "something we are
investigating aggressively right now," he said.
The sender could be charged with a felony and receive up to three years in
state prison, he said.
Trasviña wants an investigation of a "potential violation" of federal
election law, which prohibits intimidation, threats or coercion.
He said he was aware of six people who received the letter, all of whom "appear
to be naturalized citizen voters from Latin American countries." Voters'
birthplaces are available from voter registration records.
…(Barbara Coe) said her group was investigated by the FBI in 1996 and 1998
because members held signs near polls stating that only citizens can vote.
The letter's assertion that immigrants can't vote is untrue, because immigrants
who become naturalized citizens can register to vote. Trasviña said that an
undocumented immigrant who voted could be subject to deportation and jail.
The letter's assertion that the state has developed a computer system that
will make it easy to track down immigrants and illegal residents, however,
is false, he said.
Amin David, who leads the civic group Los Amigos of Orange County, said the
Spanish used in the letter is very formal, perhaps suggesting it was written
by a non-native speaker. The Spanish includes grammatical errors.
_____________________________
5)
Tribune Values
Citizenship - Giving back
to the communities in which we do business, as a company and as individuals,
through philanthropy and civic involvement.
Integrity - Earning the
trust of our customers by applying high ethical standards to our business
operations and journalism every day.
Teamwork - Achieving our
goals through sharing ideas and resources, focusing on the needs of customers
and not organizational boundaries.
Tribune in the Community
Our commitment to the communities
we serve goes well beyond providing news, information and entertainment. Tribune’s
local media businesses support a wide range of nonprofit organizations that
help people in need and contribute to building healthy, vibrant communities.
As a company and as individuals, giving back is the right thing to do. Citizenship
is also good business because as our communities grow stronger, so does our
company.
Community involvement comes
easily to our local business units. That’s partly due to the nature of their
work -- reporting the news of their communities and supplying information
to the people who live in them. In the course of these activities, our businesses
often discover and act upon opportunities to address important needs.
_____________________________
